If sexual harassment includes unwelcome or inappropriate sexual behavior that makes other people feel uncomfortable, as feminists have defined it, then wearing sexually provocative clothing in public should be considered sexual harassment

Being around women in public who are revealing their sexual body parts or underwear via revealing clothing makes me very uncomfortable, especially when I am with my children.

We all recognize that it is sexual behavior to wear very short skirts, very nearly or often explicitly flashing their underwear to both children and adults alike. The same applies to revealing blouses that accentuate the cleavage and expose much of the breasts. In fact, it is especially women's clothing that is so revealing and sexually provocative.

The definition of sexual harassment, due to the influence of feminist ideology, has widened to include a variety of sexual behaviors that make women feel uncomfortable.

So I believe it is appropriate to include as sexual harassment dressing in a way that forces viewers to view too much of one's sexual body parts. That may include flashing your underwear while wearing a very short skirt or wearing translucent material that reveals too much of the underwear beneath. If when you bend over someone can see your naked breast that is considered sexual harassment. You cannot walk around braless or without underwear and then expose your naked body to the public.

The only reason it has not been added to the definition of sexual harassment is because women would be guilty of this crime in far larger numbers than men. They claim it is their freedom to expose their body in a sexual way in a public space, but they give no regard to how it makes others feel.

Whereas if some sexual behavior a man does makes women feel uncomfortable then it is more likely to be considered sexual harassment. It is a clear double standard