CRT vs New TV's

Okay so I know most retro gaming enthusiasts will say there is "nothing like" playing on a CRT. But as a new collector, it feels like there would be a lot of scenarios where a newer tv would look better. And I'm wanting to dig a little deeper and get some opinions.

Some examples:

I understand if someone believes stretching an N64 image over a 65" 4k tv looks bad. Even with a retrotink 4k. But what if you used a retrotink 4k on a 20" hd tv. Wouldn't bringing the resolution to 4k on such a small display make up for the fact that it's not a crt? Couldn't an image filter band it close enough to the real thing, to make it worth it considering the massive resolution jump?

It seems like the experience you have includes a few factors:

1: Input lag 2: Resolution 3: That "CRT" look

Some people argue that the lower resolution hides some of the other flaws of the picture. That the CRT look can't be replicated, and input lag is always worse on an HD screen.

But with something like that retrotink 5x or retrotink 4k, if you're playing on a 120hz tv, to my understanding you can add the black frame insertion, you can get the input lag extremely low, and with a massive resolution jump, and adding a crt filter, it feels like you could potentially get SO MUCH of a better image that a very small input lag makes it worth it especially with the good filters and options with something like the 4k.

I say all this because I want you to either agree with me or prove me wrong. I've got a 25" CRT Sony TV downstairs with s video. It looks fine, not as good as my cheaper 18" CRT, but it looks fine. But I'm wondering if it's really worth moving all my retro consoles upstairs and buying a retrotink.

And I'm also curious if the Ps2, or Nintendo wii, if they are better off with the crt or moving to a newer tv.

The massive resolution bump feels tempting. Even if it isn't perfectly retro. But I'm wanting to be educated. I've done some research but I'm stuck in the middle